-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
make use of locked markers in lock file version 2.1 and thereby avoid dependency walk failed
#286
Draft
radoering
wants to merge
2
commits into
python-poetry:main
Choose a base branch
from
radoering:dependency-walk-failed
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2 tasks
radoering
force-pushed
the
dependency-walk-failed
branch
2 times, most recently
from
May 20, 2024 14:31
e2cdfad
to
7a89609
Compare
This does resolve the long-standing issue with |
Very interested, we have been having issues with urllib3 as well |
radoering
force-pushed
the
dependency-walk-failed
branch
from
June 4, 2024 14:42
7a89609
to
42c96c1
Compare
radoering
force-pushed
the
dependency-walk-failed
branch
2 times, most recently
from
June 16, 2024 11:55
6a992f7
to
9feaa40
Compare
Quality Gate failedFailed conditions |
radoering
force-pushed
the
dependency-walk-failed
branch
2 times, most recently
from
July 14, 2024 05:53
568bf9f
to
fd8a2de
Compare
radoering
force-pushed
the
dependency-walk-failed
branch
from
July 29, 2024 04:52
fd8a2de
to
ac2addc
Compare
radoering
force-pushed
the
dependency-walk-failed
branch
from
August 24, 2024 13:03
ac2addc
to
9e30454
Compare
… `dependency walk failed`
radoering
force-pushed
the
dependency-walk-failed
branch
from
September 15, 2024 12:18
9e30454
to
164904a
Compare
Quality Gate failedFailed conditions |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves: #176
Resolves: #183
Requires: python-poetry/poetry#9427
With python-poetry/poetry#9427 we can fix
dependency walk failed
once and for all. The dependency walker becomes as simple as iterating over a flat list and doing some simple marker operations. There is no complicated erroneous logic anymore because the resulting markers for each locked package can be read from the lock file.I adapted all tests so they are run with an old lock file without markers and with a new lock file with markers and added a test (at the end) that raises
dependency walk failed
for an old lock file and succeeds for a new lock file.