-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-98989: configure: add 3.11 to list of Pythons #98988
Conversation
JelleZijlstra
commented
Nov 2, 2022
•
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading
edited by bedevere-bot
- Issue: configure on main branch does not look for python3.11 #98989
I'll add an issue and NEWS since the bug went out in 3.12a1 and could affect some users. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't take my word for it, this is probably up to @tiran or @brettcannon to review.
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ AC_SUBST([FREEZE_MODULE_DEPS]) | |||
AC_SUBST([PYTHON_FOR_BUILD_DEPS]) | |||
|
|||
AC_CHECK_PROGS([PYTHON_FOR_REGEN], | |||
[python$PACKAGE_VERSION python3.10 python3.9 python3.8 python3.7 python3.6 python3 python], | |||
[python$PACKAGE_VERSION python3.11 python3.10 python3.9 python3.8 python3.7 python3.6 python3 python], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Worth queuing up a couple versions?
Something to add to PEP 101 (Doing Python Releases)? |
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ AC_SUBST([FREEZE_MODULE_DEPS]) | |||
AC_SUBST([PYTHON_FOR_BUILD_DEPS]) | |||
|
|||
AC_CHECK_PROGS([PYTHON_FOR_REGEN], | |||
[python$PACKAGE_VERSION python3.10 python3.9 python3.8 python3.7 python3.6 python3 python], | |||
[python$PACKAGE_VERSION python3.11 python3.10 python3.9 python3.8 python3.7 python3.6 python3 python], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are we allowing python3.8
and lower in the first place if we know that 3.9+ is required?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If 3.9 or higher is required, we should remove the earlier and incompatible versions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Guido said he wanted to remove the 3.9+ dependency that crept into one of the scripts. Increasing the minimum required version might need more discussion as it could make bootstrapping harder for some.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok sure let's get this in first as this is failing randomly on PRs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@erlend-aasland any objections to landing this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nah, good to good for my part :)
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Build/2022-11-01-21-45-58.gh-issue-98989.tMxbdB.rst
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…dB.rst Co-authored-by: Erlend E. Aasland <[email protected]>
|