Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ET-VK] Simplify lane offset copy logic in copy_packed_dim_offset shader. #9416

Merged

Conversation

…der.

This diff simplifies the logic for handling different lane offsets in `copy_packed_dim_offset` shader.

Differential Revision: [D71507929](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D71507929/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Mar 19, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/9416

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 5af593c with merge base feb3fcd (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

trivedivivek added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2025
…der.

This diff simplifies the logic for handling different lane offsets in `copy_packed_dim_offset` shader.

Differential Revision: [D71507929](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D71507929/)

ghstack-source-id: 272850534
Pull Request resolved: #9416
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Mar 19, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71507929

…_offset shader."

This diff simplifies the logic for handling different lane offsets in `copy_packed_dim_offset` shader.

Differential Revision: [D71507929](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D71507929/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71507929

…_offset shader."

This diff simplifies the logic for handling different lane offsets in `copy_packed_dim_offset` shader.

Differential Revision: [D71507929](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D71507929/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71507929

…_offset shader."

This diff simplifies the logic for handling different lane offsets in `copy_packed_dim_offset` shader.

Differential Revision: [D71507929](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D71507929/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
trivedivivek added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2025
…der.

Pull Request resolved: #9416

This diff simplifies the logic for handling different lane offsets in `copy_packed_dim_offset` shader.
ghstack-source-id: 275286119
@exported-using-ghexport

Differential Revision: [D71507929](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D71507929/)
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71507929

…_offset shader."

This diff simplifies the logic for handling different lane offsets in `copy_packed_dim_offset` shader.

Differential Revision: [D71507929](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D71507929/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D71507929

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot merged commit 47d8bcb into gh/trivedivivek/69/base Apr 1, 2025
84 checks passed
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/trivedivivek/69/head branch April 1, 2025 21:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported topic: not user facing
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants