Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update dependency eslint to v8.57.1 #99

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented May 9, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
eslint (source) 8.56.0 -> 8.57.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

eslint/eslint (eslint)

v8.57.1

Compare Source

v8.57.0

Compare Source

Features

  • 1120b9b feat: Add loadESLint() API method for v8 (#​18098) (Nicholas C. Zakas)
  • dca7d0f feat: Enable eslint.config.mjs and eslint.config.cjs (#​18066) (Nitin Kumar)

Bug Fixes

  • 2196d97 fix: handle absolute file paths in FlatRuleTester (#​18064) (Nitin Kumar)
  • 69dd1d1 fix: Ensure config keys are printed for config errors (#​18067) (Nitin Kumar)
  • 9852a31 fix: deep merge behavior in flat config (#​18065) (Nitin Kumar)
  • 4c7e9b0 fix: allow circular references in config (#​18056) (Milos Djermanovic)

Documentation

Chores


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency eslint to v8.57.0 Update dependency eslint to v8.57.1 Sep 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants