Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add DataFrame class #88

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 6, 2023
Merged

Add DataFrame class #88

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 6, 2023

Conversation

pdeziel
Copy link
Collaborator

@pdeziel pdeziel commented Nov 3, 2023

This PR adds an experimental package ml with an initial DataFrame implementation.

TODOs and questions

CHECKLIST

  • Is the commit message formatted correctly?
  • Do all of your functions and methods have docstrings?
  • Have you added/updated unit tests where appropriate?
  • Have you run the unit tests using pytest?
  • Is your code style correct (are you using PEP8, pyflakes)?

Copy link

This pull request has been linked to Shortcut Story #22383: Explore streaming DataFrames.

@@ -121,6 +121,9 @@ def get_description_type(path=PKG_DESCRIBE):
"download_url": "{}/tarball/v{}".format(REPOSITORY, get_version()),
"packages": find_packages(where=PROJECT, exclude=EXCLUDES),
"install_requires": list(get_requires()),
"extras_require": {
"ml": ["pandas==2.1.2"],
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The idea is that we can make this an extra package e.g. pip install pyensign[ml], I'm not sure what else we need to do to make that happen but this ensures that pandas is not in the regular dependencies.

Copy link
Member

@rebeccabilbro rebeccabilbro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is extremely cool @pdeziel! Once this is merged, maybe you could ask @pdamodaran to start experimenting a bit with these by installing from the develop branch?

Comment on lines 141 to 142
print(df)
print(expected)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we remove these prints?

@pdeziel pdeziel merged commit 33ee569 into develop Nov 6, 2023
4 checks passed
@pdeziel pdeziel deleted the sc-22383 branch November 6, 2023 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants