-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 356
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bugfix: Issue #455: StorageContext not saving data after deleting document/ref info #486
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
@@ -55,6 +55,11 @@ export class SimpleKVStore extends BaseKVStore { | |||
): Promise<boolean> { | |||
if (key in this.data[collection]) { | |||
delete this.data[collection][key]; | |||
|
|||
if (this.persistPath) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@1997roylee thanks for looking into #455!
but persisting the whole store can take a long time, so doing it for every change operation seems not to be feasible. That's why we're having the explicit persist
method.
We're working on a fix for #455.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It makes sense, but why is the 'persist' method checking if the instance is equal to 'BaseInMemoryKVStore'? I don't see any involvement of 'SimpleDocumentStore' with 'BaseInMemoryKVStore'.
I proposed to change the BaseInMemoryKVStore to SimpleKVStore.
Original code:
this.kvStore instanceof BaseInMemoryKVStore
Now:
this.kvStore instanceof SimpleKVStore
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@1997roylee good catch, i think we don't need this instanceof check at all - @himself65 can you have a look into this while working on #487 ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes I think instanceof is useless here. But it okay for now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should I close this PR? Or I can help to fix the persist issue of another class.
Issue #455: StorageContext not saving data after deleting document/ref info
Changes Proposed:
Change the BaseInMemoryKVStore to SimpleKVStore for SimpleDocumentStore.
Original code:
Now: