You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I often find that when I'm plotting relatively small plots (e.g. 4x4 inches pdf) with many points, reducing the point size with thept.size argument to FeaturePlot, DimPlot, etc, seems to have no impact on the actual point size in the resulting plot. It's basically the same issue as described here. Based on the answers there, I made a custom version of SingleDimPlot where I set stroke = 0 in the call to geom_point (i.e., here). This gave me the desired output - smaller points with less overplotting at the necessary output size.
I was wondering if this change could be made in the code, or if you could add an option, similar to pt.size, that
would allow users to customise stroke width as needed?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I often find that when I'm plotting relatively small plots (e.g. 4x4 inches pdf) with many points, reducing the point size with the
pt.size
argument toFeaturePlot
,DimPlot
, etc, seems to have no impact on the actual point size in the resulting plot. It's basically the same issue as described here. Based on the answers there, I made a custom version ofSingleDimPlot
where I setstroke = 0
in the call togeom_point
(i.e., here). This gave me the desired output - smaller points with less overplotting at the necessary output size.I was wondering if this change could be made in the code, or if you could add an option, similar to
pt.size
, thatwould allow users to customise stroke width as needed?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: