[Concurrency] Look for explicit 'nonisolated' when getting isolation from protocol conformances. #79893
+83
−4
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
simanerush
requested review from
ktoso,
hborla,
slavapestov and
xedin
as code owners
|
@swift-ci please smoke test |
…from protocol conformances.
simanerush
force-pushed
the
fix-explicit-nonisolated-proto-inference
branch
from
0240c50 to
5825021
Compare
…e kind is explicit.
|
@swift-ci please smoke test macOS |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If the protocol from the conformance list explicitly strips off global actor with
nonisolated, make sure to look for this explicit isolation source when computing the resulting isolation; to prevent accidental global actor inference on the conforming type.Resolves rdar://144798727.