Replace eval() with new Function() #963
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Replace
```js
eval(attrValue)
```
with
```js
(new Function('return ('+attrValue+')'))()
```
### Why?
`eval()` is evaluated in the scope where it is called, which exposes all the (private) variables to the string script being evaluated.
Besides security considerations, it disables mangling of all variables names in the scope (and all parent scopes) during code minification, because every variable could be potentially used in the `eval()`.
The `(new Function(str))()` approach is much safer, cause it does not have access to the current scope.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Replace
with
Why?
eval()is evaluated in the scope where it is called, which exposes all the (private) variables to the string script being evaluated.Besides security considerations, it disables mangling of all variables names in the scope (and all parent scopes) during code minification, because every variable could be potentially used in the
eval().The
(new Function(str))()approach is much safer, cause it does not have access to the current scope.