Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated, rearranged software repositories and package managers #2640

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AlbydST
Copy link

@AlbydST AlbydST commented Dec 19, 2023

I added Slackware to the list of software repositories, and moved NixOS and GNU Guix to that category since their package managers are independent and closely related to their base distributions. I also added APK (for Alpine Linux and FreeBSD) and APT-RPM (for PCLinuxOS, Vine Linux, and ALT Linux) to the list of package managers.

I added Slackware to the list of software repositories, and moved NixOS and GNU Guix to that category since their package managers are independent and closely related to their base distributions. I also added APK (for Alpine Linux and FreeBSD) and APT-RPM (for PCLinuxOS, Vine Linux, and ALT Linux) to the list of package managers.
@AlbydST AlbydST requested a review from a team as a code owner December 19, 2023 15:17
@Ahrotahn
Copy link
Contributor

Since the lower section is for the independent package managers it would better to swap the positions of the Nix & Guix lines with the APK & APT-RPM ones.

I like that you updated the "Available as ..." text with the install command. Maybe the APK & APT-RPM lines should be split up to have each OS and it's install command as well?

… Windows

I swapped APK and APT-RPM package managers with NixOS and GNU Guix. I also found out Ungoogled-Chromium is available on Winget and Chocolatey too so I decided to also add these.
@AlbydST
Copy link
Author

AlbydST commented Dec 21, 2023

Ok, what about now? I also decided to add Chocolatey and Winget to the repos list because why not, let me know what you think.

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
AlbydST and others added 2 commits December 22, 2023 18:08
Co-authored-by: networkException <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: networkException <[email protected]>
Ahrotahn
Ahrotahn previously approved these changes Dec 23, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@Ahrotahn Ahrotahn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems fine to me! Thanks @AlbydST

@PF4Public
Copy link
Contributor

Does one really need to specify version for Slackware?

@networkException
Copy link
Member

I mean if people package it for Slackware, why not :D

I'm sure someone will use it

@PF4Public
Copy link
Contributor

PF4Public commented Dec 26, 2023

I mean if people package it for Slackware, why not :D

I'm sure someone will use it

My question was more in the direction that a command having a version in it will soon stop functioning as written.

Sorry if it wasn't clear from my original message.

@Ahrotahn
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not familiar with Slackware's package manager but wouldn't upgradepkg --install-new chromium-ungoogled install the latest version? That would be the better option if so.

@alienbob
Copy link

alienbob commented Jan 4, 2024

Thanks for incorporating instructions for Slackware users. The "upgradepkg --install-new" is the simplest instruction I can think of, so thanks Ahrotahn for suggesting it.
And finally, it may help users to know the full path to the packages instead of merely the URL for the webhost - this URL will never change: http://www.slackware.com/~alien/slackbuilds/chromium-ungoogled/

I fixed the ungoogled-chromium repository URL and install command for Slackware, added Scoop installation guide, changed from APK to PKG because ungoogled-chromium is only available in FreeBSD's repo and not in Alpine's and changed from "GNU/Linux distribution" to "Operating System / Linux Distribution" because we also have BSD and Windows now.
@AlbydST AlbydST dismissed stale reviews from networkException and Ahrotahn via af9114a January 5, 2024 11:07
Ahrotahn
Ahrotahn previously approved these changes Jan 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@PF4Public PF4Public left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changed from "GNU/Linux distribution" to "Operating System / Linux Distribution" because we also have BSD and Windows now.

Sorry, but your changes completely alter the meaning of that line, making it even incorrect! One cannot use Flatpak either on BSD or on Windows!

@PF4Public
Copy link
Contributor

Why did you remove GNU and why did you change the order. It was good, it was alphabetic :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants