Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[wip] refactor[tool]: update storage layout format #4495

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

charles-cooper
Copy link
Member

What I did

How I did it

How to verify it

Commit message

Commit message for the final, squashed PR. (Optional, but reviewers will appreciate it! Please see our commit message style guide for what we would ideally like to see in a commit message.)

Description for the changelog

Cute Animal Picture

Put a link to a cute animal picture inside the parenthesis-->

@charles-cooper charles-cooper changed the title refactor[tool]: update storage layout format [wip] refactor[tool]: update storage layout format Feb 24, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 25, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.59259% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 92.05%. Comparing base (dd5a3d9) to head (6a91fb4).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
vyper/cli/vyper_json.py 77.77% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
vyper/semantics/analysis/imports.py 85.71% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4495      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.06%   92.05%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         120      120              
  Lines       17335    17353      +18     
  Branches     2935     2937       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        15960    15975      +15     
- Misses        957      960       +3     
  Partials      418      418              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant