Vocabulary change: termsOfUse no longer reserved #1541
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* main: Added the new vocabulary file for undefined terms (#1536) Add explanation of securing mechanism examples. Remove mention of ZKP schemas since we have no examples to point to. Reformat status spec requirements in Status section.
iherman
requested review from
msporny,
TallTed,
selfissued and
decentralgabe
as code owners
msporny
approved these changes
Aug 9, 2024
msporny
added
editorial
|
Purely editorial, merging. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See WG meeting of Aug 7 (with more details here):
termsOfUseis no longer a "reserved" term; the vocabulary definition, and the corresponding diagram, have been changed accordingly.