Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: function params useage #1542

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

Lz020316
Copy link
Contributor

@Lz020316 Lz020316 commented Feb 13, 2025

Important

Fix parameter names in Python scan event examples in event.mdx.

  • Python Examples:
    • Fix parameter name staus to status in on_scan function.
    • Fix parameter name qrcode to qr_code in on_scan function.

This description was created by Ellipsis for bcb62cc. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced the clarity and accuracy of Python examples in the event handling documentation by refining parameter details and output messages for improved user comprehension.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Walkthrough

This update revises the Python code examples in the Wechaty bot documentation. The modifications include renaming the parameter in the on_scan handler from qrcode to qr_code, correcting typos in print statements (changing staus to status), and adding type annotations to the parameters of the on_login, on_message, and on_friendship handlers. These changes aim to improve clarity and correctness in the event handling examples.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
docusaurus/docs/howto/event.mdx - Renamed parameter in on_scan from qrcode to qr_code and fixed the print statement to use status.
- Added type annotation Contact to on_login.
- Added type annotation Message to on_message.
- Added type annotation Friendship to on_friendship.

Poem

Hop along with code so neat,
Parameters and types now complete,
A little tweak here, a fix there,
Buggy hints vanish into thin air,
I'm a rabbit, delighted by this treat!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to bcb62cc in 37 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 28 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 4 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. docusaurus/docs/howto/event.mdx:160
  • Draft comment:
    Typo and variable name corrections: 'staus' is fixed to 'status' and 'qrcode' to 'qr_code'. Good fix.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
    This comment is purely informative, pointing out typo corrections and variable name changes. It doesn't provide a suggestion or ask for confirmation about the changes.
2. docusaurus/docs/howto/event.mdx:170
  • Draft comment:
    Consistent variable corrections in the MyBot.on_scan method: fixed parameter names to match.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Marked as duplicate.
3. docusaurus/docs/howto/event.mdx:160
  • Draft comment:
    Typo fix: updated parameters in on_scan to use 'qr_code' and 'status' instead of the previously misspelled variables.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Marked as duplicate.
4. docusaurus/docs/howto/event.mdx:172
  • Draft comment:
    Corrected parameter names in MyBot.on_scan: replaced 'qrcode' with 'qr_code' and fixed typo 'staus' to 'status'.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Marked as duplicate.

Workflow ID: wflow_yQIGJDB5bPmOYO8Z


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docusaurus/docs/howto/event.mdx (1)

161-163: Add type hints to method one for consistency.

Method two includes proper type hints, but method one doesn't. For consistency, consider adding type hints to method one:

-def on_scan (qr_code, status):
+def on_scan (qr_code: str, status: ScanStatus):
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c97fbc0 and bcb62cc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docusaurus/docs/howto/event.mdx (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Test & Build
🔇 Additional comments (4)
docusaurus/docs/howto/event.mdx (4)

277-289: LGTM!

The code is well-structured with proper type hints and consistent f-string usage across both implementation methods.


496-510: LGTM!

The code demonstrates good practices with proper type hints and consistent f-string usage in both implementation methods.


647-661: LGTM!

The code follows best practices with proper type hints and consistent f-string usage across both implementation methods.


1-1499: Documentation quality has been improved.

The changes have enhanced the Python code examples by:

  1. Following Python naming conventions (e.g., qr_code instead of qrcode)
  2. Adding proper type hints
  3. Using consistent string formatting with f-strings

These improvements make the documentation more professional and easier to follow.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[misspelling] ~15-~15: This expression is normally spelled as one or with a hyphen.
Context: ... sure you are already familiar with the ding dong bot. If not, go to [examples/basics](ht...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_DING_DONG)


[typographical] ~88-~88: Consider adding a comma here.
Context: ...and: bash npm start But, before that we need to add events to the bot. See t...

(FOR_THAT_COMMA)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant