-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor feature flag overrider architecture to make use of the manager pattern #85
Conversation
3ae9c56
to
6762c33
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great in my opinion. 👍🏻 Would be good to do some testing platform with a PR to ensure everything transitions smoothly.
Only things I've found should be resolved with an ecs --fix
(except the comment I made, which needs to be done manually).
@owenvoke Platform would require small adjustments so I was planning to do a PR there yes as you suggested👍 |
@jeremynikolic, if you add the branch as the version, it should all work fine. 👍🏻 ...
"worksome/feature-flags": "dev-feat_overrider_refactor"
... Happy to pair or assist if needed. |
@owenvoke wonderful, I did not know you could do that :D |
87fe6dc
to
c598a7e
Compare
621a2fc
to
3d238e9
Compare
9050990
to
a6dd040
Compare
Adjust the way config works around overriders so that other overriders may be defined outside the package using the manager pattern
a6dd040
to
aed2170
Compare
@owenvoke do you feel we are in a good place now with this and the PR to platform to merge ? 🤔 |
0e281fe
to
9a635a0
Compare
@jeremynikolic, I've just pushed some ECS changes. But otherwise LGTM for a 2.x release! |
Nice thanks @owenvoke |
@owenvoke if you may approve then 😄 |
Whoops my bad. |
We'll also need to update the docs where necessary. |
No description provided.