-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 552
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[16.0][MIG] base_tier_validation_correction #674
base: 16.0
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[16.0][MIG] base_tier_validation_correction #674
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code review LGTM 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very quick code review.
Please force push to recreate runboat and tests.
self.assertFalse(doc_user2.can_review) | ||
# User 1, is the reviewer as specified in the tier.definition | ||
doc_user1 = self.test_record.with_user(self.test_user_1.id) | ||
doc_user1._invalidate_cache() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
doc_user1._invalidate_cache() | |
doc_user1.invalidate_recordset() |
invalidate_cache() is deprecated.
Please change this here, among with the other places it occurs in this file
self.assertTrue(doc_user2.can_review) | ||
doc_user1._invalidate_cache() | ||
self.assertFalse(doc_user1.can_review) | ||
# Make reversion, now user 1 can reivew |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
# Make reversion, now user 1 can reivew | |
# Make reversion, now user 1 can review |
@ChrisOForgeFlow Can you attend to this? 🙏 |
There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days. |
Can we reopen and try to get it merged? |
@ForgeFlow Can you attend to my comments? |
10b8fbf
to
740df60
Compare
Hi @bosd ! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM Let's Merge!! 🎊
@ForgeFlow