Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UI changes to use the renamed product features from core #22971 #9142

Merged

Conversation

@jrafanie jrafanie requested a review from a team as a code owner April 1, 2024 19:48
@jrafanie jrafanie changed the title [WIP] UI changes to use the renamed product features from core #22971 UI changes to use the renamed product features from core #22971 Apr 1, 2024
@@ -1892,7 +1892,8 @@ def controller_for_common_methods
"embedded_configuration_script_payload"
when "workflow_repository"
"ansible_repository"
# TODO: Update manageiq/db/fixtures/miq_product_features.yml by replacing ansible_credential_tag with embedded_automation_manager_credential_tag
# DONE: Update manageiq/db/fixtures/miq_product_features.yml by replacing ansible_credential_tag with embedded_automation_manager_credential_tag
# TODO: This is now done, can we fix this case statement?
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@GilbertCherrie not sure if we can fix this case statement now that we rename this. It was added in 1cc6e74 and treats workflows like ansible repositories..

@jrafanie jrafanie force-pushed the rename_ansible_tag_features_to_be_generic branch from 5e08341 to 089b404 Compare April 1, 2024 20:25
# "embedded_automation_manager_credential"
when "workflow_credential"
"ansible_credential"
when "workflow_repository", "ansible_repository"
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added ansible_repository to match the pattern we have in the next when:

when "workflow_credential", "ansible_credential"

It didn't exist here before. Feel free to drop it.

@jrafanie jrafanie force-pushed the rename_ansible_tag_features_to_be_generic branch 2 times, most recently from 2f85e13 to 859f921 Compare May 2, 2024 18:13
@jrafanie jrafanie force-pushed the rename_ansible_tag_features_to_be_generic branch from 859f921 to c19142b Compare May 2, 2024 20:06
@jrafanie jrafanie force-pushed the rename_ansible_tag_features_to_be_generic branch from c19142b to 0c22315 Compare May 2, 2024 20:46
@jrafanie jrafanie force-pushed the rename_ansible_tag_features_to_be_generic branch from 55b4b57 to 2cc2c07 Compare May 8, 2024 16:07
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented May 8, 2024

Checked commits jrafanie/manageiq-ui-classic@94fcf9b~...2cc2c07 with ruby 2.7.8, rubocop 1.56.3, haml-lint 0.51.0, and yamllint
18 files checked, 1 offense detected

app/presenters/menu/default_menu.rb

@agrare
Copy link
Member

agrare commented May 8, 2024

Okay with the core PR merged spec:routes passes locally for me

@agrare agrare merged commit 5e32f48 into ManageIQ:master May 8, 2024
11 of 15 checks passed
@jrafanie jrafanie deleted the rename_ansible_tag_features_to_be_generic branch May 8, 2024 18:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants